For God Sakes...DUHHH!!!!
Optimistic, Democrats Debate the Party's Vision - New York Times
Really. They've just only started debating the Democratic Party's vision--or should I say lack of vision--until now? As Maddox would say, "How do you idiots manage to breathe?" I've been talking about this since Bush was reelected. The party needs a nationwide populist platform. The Democratic Party until now have somewhat clear stances on only decisive issues: gay marriage, abortion, illegal immigration. Good for the party to stand up to those issues, but what about the motherf*cking BIG issues? Economy? Foreign Policy? Terrorism? Education? Social Security? People are starving for new ideas. They are desparate to find alternatives to the government that wasn't able to find Osama Bin Laden, stabalize Iraq, and save New Orleans. Absolutely not a single idea on those big issues from any of these f*cking Democrat idiots.
What are these people doing? Oh yeah, I know. I've been watching C-SPAN. They're just standing around, half-assing their debates on Congressional lobbying reform while minority leaders like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are quietly doing press conferences in an empty room. Meanwhile, you got party chairperson, Howard "YEEAHRRG!" Dean, saying the stupid crap that alienates more voters ("I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for..." Way to go, genius. You just lost the moderate Republicans that we need in order to win.) The blind leading the blind, folks.
Really. They've just only started debating the Democratic Party's vision--or should I say lack of vision--until now? As Maddox would say, "How do you idiots manage to breathe?" I've been talking about this since Bush was reelected. The party needs a nationwide populist platform. The Democratic Party until now have somewhat clear stances on only decisive issues: gay marriage, abortion, illegal immigration. Good for the party to stand up to those issues, but what about the motherf*cking BIG issues? Economy? Foreign Policy? Terrorism? Education? Social Security? People are starving for new ideas. They are desparate to find alternatives to the government that wasn't able to find Osama Bin Laden, stabalize Iraq, and save New Orleans. Absolutely not a single idea on those big issues from any of these f*cking Democrat idiots.
What are these people doing? Oh yeah, I know. I've been watching C-SPAN. They're just standing around, half-assing their debates on Congressional lobbying reform while minority leaders like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are quietly doing press conferences in an empty room. Meanwhile, you got party chairperson, Howard "YEEAHRRG!" Dean, saying the stupid crap that alienates more voters ("I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for..." Way to go, genius. You just lost the moderate Republicans that we need in order to win.) The blind leading the blind, folks.
1 Comments:
Interesting set of criteria.
I think, in general, the liberal version, in very simple terms, is as follows:
1) Is it good for people, as well as America.
2) Is it fair.
3) Does it benefit people socially, economically, or intellectually.
I'd venture to guess that you would be incorrect that liberals are primarily in college or young (that seems pretty contrary to the stereotype of the "liberal elite", which admittedly has always been a subset of liberals in general, but I doubt they're all in college). Plus, I'd almost venture the same regarding conservatives, that the conservative kids don't really want to think about real issues or politics. Anyway, those are pretty broad remarks, so I guess I can return in kind. What do conservatives do as people? Conform with the establishment?
By
Ron, at 5/10/2006 6:39 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home